Organizations made up of individuals who truly hate others as displayed not by their own anti-White, politically-correct media but by their actual actions and the negative product of those actions.

The term “Kike” came from US immigration officials at Ellis Island. Millions of Eastern and western Jews entered the US, and since they could not speak English officials told them to sign entry forms with an “X.” –But to many Jews an “X” was a cross, signifying Christianity, so they adamantly refused. -So rather than an “X” they used a circle to sign forms. The Yiddish word for circle is “kikel,” so these kikel-signers were nicknamed “Kikes” by immigration clerks. For several decades even Jewish merchants continued to refer to Jews this way. –But since us Gentiles created the term, it became taboo, just as they also dislike being called “a Jew,” preferring to be called “Jewish.”

Listen for the telltale jargon: School-to-Work, School-to-Careers, Career Awareness, restructuring, performance-based, outcome-based, cooperative learning, group grading, teamwork, peer tutoring, job shadowing, mentoring, job profiles, portfolios, job site visits.

Reverence of our race, kith, kin, heritage, history, culture and nation.

Adhering to a code of values, morals, virtues, responsibilities and principles.

A primary Responsibility. Nationalism is duty to one's kind, true to racial identity; for our people come before all others.

     The Nationalist Movement was founded by Mark Watts on January 20 , 1987 in Cumming, Georgia , in opposition to civil rights activists in Forsyth County, Atlanta. 

    The Nationalist Movement's goal of an "all-American America" were set out in its twelve-point Forsyth County Covenant. Thousands marched in its initial parade on January 24 , 1987 , but sixty-six were arrested and police broke up the reading of the Covenant at the Forsyth County Courthouse. 

     The Covenant was adopted at a meeting, led by Watts, in a chicken house in Forsyth County on February 22 , 1987 and ratified by Jimmy Wynn, at the courthouse, after Nationalists won a lawsuit, allowing them to assemble on March 14, 1987. 

     The Covenant was promulgated at a rally, led by Greg Myers, on the steps of the National Capitol in Washington, D.C. , on May 19 , 1987 . It was adopted by the Nationalist National Convention in Suwanee, Georgia , led by Bob Smith, on July 16 , 1988 , at which the Nationalist Platform was adopted and its headquarters moved to Learned, Mississippi. 

      1. Majority rule. The majority -- not the minority -- must rule. The democracy of the American People must be inviolate. 

The six fundamentals:

1. Unity. We shall attain the spiritual and cultural unity and advancement of Anglo-American heritage, language and destiny.
2. Labor. We shall uplift those who labor, by providing more abundant lives, a higher standard of living and decent income.
3. Social Justice. We shall guarantee social justice by providing for the sick, the elderly, the oppressed, the poor and the downtrodden.
4. Victory. We shall eradicate the plague of Communism from the face of the earth.
5. Democracy. We shall provide genuine democratic and representative majority rule, with justice for all and favors for none.
6. Liberty. We shall advance civilization by reaching to the heavens, bringing peace to the earth and realizing the full liberty and potential, through Nationalism, of our transcendent people.

Background

      The New Atlantic Charter commences with this Preamble:

We dedicate this New Atlantic Charter to the unity, liberty, democracy and victory of Anglo-American Nationalists in the cause of freedom and justice.

      The instrument was signed by The National Front and The Nationalist Movement in London, England on October 3, 1989, during the Annual General Meeting of The National Front. Signatories were Paul Nash and Richard Barrett. Richard Barrett was introduced at The National Front by then-Chairman Ian Anderson for his Raise Your Excalibur speech. The following year, The Nationalist Movement hosted Nick Griffin, a spokesman for The National Front, in America. Griffin was welcomed by Richard Barrett and former Governor Orval Faubus and addressed Mississippi youth.

      The Charter was a breakthrough in Anglo-American unity, extending even beyond the first Atlantic Charter which pledged war-time cooperation. A similar convocation was later held at the Lithuanian Embassy in Washington. Nationalists have held ceremonies in South Boston, led by Irishman Jimmy MacNeill, expanding upon ties between Ireland and America, as well as Scotland and Wales. Despite coming under strong attack by anti-Nationalist incendiaries, the principles of the Charter were spreading on both sides of the Atlantic, especially in Hungary, Austria, Germany, Sweden, Lithuania and Latvia.

ADL preaches racial integration, racial equality and multiculturalism, as one of their most popular slogans is: “Diversity is our greatest strength.” This highly influential pressure group sponsors activities that urge people “to reject racial division,” and condemns discrimination against Jews in housing as an “an insidious form of anti-Semitism." A major focus of their activity in the US in the 1960s was the implementing the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This legislation help create a racially-integrated society in the US. They allegedly reject all forms of "racial domination” except their own. That is, a situation where one ethnic group dominates another, as they are especially hostile toward all manifestations of white unity which they call "white supremacy.” Where different ethnic groups coexist in the same nation, ADL appears to be a strong advocate of a non-white society.

Critics however have claimed that this ADL "moral agenda" is, for the most part, an ideological facade, a method by which to surreptitiously advance Jewish-Zionist interests under the guise of morality. According to this viewpoint, public opposition to racial/ethnic discrimination is being used in the service of the ADL's Jewish-Zionist ethnic/cultural nationalism. ADL preaches universalistic equality and racial/ethnic mixing for non-Jews while maintaining an exclusivist-separatist group identity for Jews.

Judaism has been characterized by genetic and cultural separation from others, and an explicit double standard of morality—altruism and cooperation among Jews, but competition with non-Jews. Thus, according to this viewpoint, the Jewish Communities that reside outside of Israel where Jews are a minority need a nation that tolerates their long-term policy of non-assimilation and group solidarity. In a racially integrated society composed of a variety of different and competing ethnic groups, all with divergent interests, it is very difficult to develop a cohesive Gentile movement that is opposed to organized Jewry. In addition, in racially integrated societies outside of Israel in which the surrounding Gentiles have only a week and feeble sense of their own racial/cultural/religious identity, Jews are less likely to be identified as a hostile, non-assimilable, and alien element. As a consequence, in racially integrated, multicultural societies outside of Israel, Jews can gain power and influence.

So which is it? Is the ADL truly interested in creating racially diverse, multicultural societies where all ethnic groups coexist on an equal basis everywhere in the world? Or is this universalistic/multicultural agenda in reality an ideological front under which they promote a Jewish-Zionist agenda—Jewish dominance in Israel where Jews are a majority, but “racial equality” and multiculturalism outside of Israel because Jewish Communities benefit enormously from such an agenda?

Fortunately, we are offered a situation where we can test these two rival, competing hypotheses: Israel. In a past issue of the New York Times, there was a controversial article that discussed proposals for replacing the Jewish-Zionist state of Israel with a Jewish-Arab state--a bi-national, ethnically integrated, secular state where Jews and Arabs would live together as social and political equals. In the article’s own words: “The unthinkable was that Israel should be replaced by a bi-national country in which Jews and Palestinians would live together in democratic harmony.”

National Chair of the ADL Barbara B. Balser responded to the article with her own “letter to the editor.” This missive apparently expresses a formal, etched-in-stone policy of the ADL. They reject the idea of a bi-national, ethnically integrated, secular state in the Middle East where Jews and Arabs would live together as political equals. They label this as an “insidious anti-Israel effort,” and “an effort to destroy Jewish sovereignty in the Holy Land.”

Curiously, when The Nationalist Movement says that multiculturalism will destroy America the ADL considers this “racist.” The fact is the ADL clearly wants to maintain Jewish sovereignty. This strongly suggests that what critics of the ADL say is indeed true.

If the primary motive of the ADL was to promote racial equality and multiculturalism and ending all forms of racial and ethnic supremacy, then we should expect that they would promote this agenda in Israel (where Jews are a majority) just as ardently as they promote it everywhere else in the world (where Jews are a minority). But this is not the case. For the most part, the ADL promotes racial integration and multiculturalism everywhere outside of Israel because it actually advances Jewish-nationalism, and enables Jews to acquire power and influence in predominantly non-Jewish societies.

That is, Universalism and calls for "racial equality" are used to serve sectarian Jewish nationalism. It is hard to believe that they sincerely believe in the ideals of racial equality and multiculturalism when they are the most ardent supporters of Israel, a separate and unequal society in which discrimination is part of the established social order and Jewish supremacism is enshrined in law.

History:

The Anti-Defamation League was not created to protect innocent Jews but the guilty ones! In 1913, Leo Frank, a director of B’nai Birth and owner of a pencil company, was found guilty of the murder of a young employee of that company, Mary Phagan. Frank was convicted based on the testimony of the janitor of the factory, Jim Conley, whom Frank tried to recruit to help clean up the mess. But Governor Slaton, who was also Jewish, commuted the death sentence. Enraged at this travesty of justice, the people of Marietta broke into Leo’s prison and lynched him. Following that case, the ADL was formed and launched a campaign to smear all witness and intimidate the media and politicians into first questioning the conviction itself, then demanding a full pardon and exoneration. The goal was not to help Leo Frank, who was of course past caring, but to do damage control; to conceal from the public the fact that such crimes were being committed by prominent members of the Jewish community by claiming that all reports of such crimes are “Anti-Semitism.” That pattern continues to the present, with the wife of Bernie Madoff in 2011 still insisting that their fall from wealth is the “Gentile’s fault!”, and the case reported below in which Rebecca Zahau was found bound hand and foot, hanging in the home of another Jewish CEO, and promptly declared a suicide on the basis of a note written in a third party’s handwriting.

The Anti-Defamation League is an anti-White, hate group.

ADL preaches racial integration, racial equality and multiculturalism, as one of their most popular slogans is: “Diversity is our greatest strength.” This highly influential pressure group sponsors activities that urge people “to reject racial division,” and condemns discrimination against Jews in housing as an “an insidious form of anti-Semitism." A major focus of their activity in the US in the 1960s was the implementing the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This legislation help create a racially-integrated society in the US. They allegedly reject all forms of "racial domination” except their own. That is, a situation where one ethnic group dominates another, as they are especially hostile toward all manifestations of white unity which they call "white supremacy.” Where different ethnic groups coexist in the same nation, ADL appears to be a strong advocate of a non-white society.

Critics however have claimed that this ADL "moral agenda" is, for the most part, an ideological facade, a method by which to surreptitiously advance Jewish-Zionist interests under the guise of morality. According to this viewpoint, public opposition to racial/ethnic discrimination is being used in the service of the ADL's Jewish-Zionist ethnic/cultural nationalism. ADL preaches universalistic equality and racial/ethnic mixing for non-Jews while maintaining an exclusivist-separatist group identity for Jews.

Judaism has been characterized by genetic and cultural separation from others, and an explicit double standard of morality—altruism and cooperation among Jews, but competition with non-Jews. Thus, according to this viewpoint, the Jewish Communities that reside outside of Israel where Jews are a minority need a nation that tolerates their long-term policy of non-assimilation and group solidarity. In a racially integrated society composed of a variety of different and competing ethnic groups, all with divergent interests, it is very difficult to develop a cohesive Gentile movement that is opposed to organized Jewry. In addition, in racially integrated societies outside of Israel in which the surrounding Gentiles have only a week and feeble sense of their own racial/cultural/religious identity, Jews are less likely to be identified as a hostile, non-assimilable, and alien element. As a consequence, in racially integrated, multicultural societies outside of Israel, Jews can gain power and influence.

So which is it? Is the ADL truly interested in creating racially diverse, multicultural societies where all ethnic groups coexist on an equal basis everywhere in the world? Or is this universalistic/multicultural agenda in reality an ideological front under which they promote a Jewish-Zionist agenda—Jewish dominance in Israel where Jews are a majority, but “racial equality” and multiculturalism outside of Israel because Jewish Communities benefit enormously from such an agenda?

Fortunately, we are offered a situation where we can test these two rival, competing hypotheses: Israel. In a past issue of the New York Times, there was a controversial article that discussed proposals for replacing the Jewish-Zionist state of Israel with a Jewish-Arab state--a bi-national, ethnically integrated, secular state where Jews and Arabs would live together as social and political equals. In the article’s own words: “The unthinkable was that Israel should be replaced by a bi-national country in which Jews and Palestinians would live together in democratic harmony.”

National Chair of the ADL Barbara B. Balser responded to the article with her own “letter to the editor.” This missive apparently expresses a formal, etched-in-stone policy of the ADL. They reject the idea of a bi-national, ethnically integrated, secular state in the Middle East where Jews and Arabs would live together as political equals. They label this as an “insidious anti-Israel effort,” and “an effort to destroy Jewish sovereignty in the Holy Land.”

Curiously, when The Nationalist Movement says that multiculturalism will destroy America the ADL considers this “racist.” The fact is the ADL clearly wants to maintain Jewish sovereignty. This strongly suggests that what critics of the ADL say is indeed true.

If the primary motive of the ADL was to promote racial equality and multiculturalism and ending all forms of racial and ethnic supremacy, then we should expect that they would promote this agenda in Israel (where Jews are a majority) just as ardently as they promote it everywhere else in the world (where Jews are a minority). But this is not the case. For the most part, the ADL promotes racial integration and multiculturalism everywhere outside of Israel because it actually advances Jewish-nationalism, and enables Jews to acquire power and influence in predominantly non-Jewish societies.

That is, Universalism and calls for "racial equality" are used to serve sectarian Jewish nationalism. It is hard to believe that they sincerely believe in the ideals of racial equality and multiculturalism when they are the most ardent supporters of Israel, a separate and unequal society in which discrimination is part of the established social order and Jewish supremacism is enshrined in law.

History:

The Anti-Defamation League was not created to protect innocent Jews but the guilty ones! In 1913, Leo Frank, a director of B’nai Birth and owner of a pencil company, was found guilty of the murder of a young employee of that company, Mary Phagan. Frank was convicted based on the testimony of the janitor of the factory, Jim Conley, whom Frank tried to recruit to help clean up the mess. But Governor Slaton, who was also Jewish, commuted the death sentence. Enraged at this travesty of justice, the people of Marietta broke into Leo’s prison and lynched him. Following that case, the ADL was formed and launched a campaign to smear all witness and intimidate the media and politicians into first questioning the conviction itself, then demanding a full pardon and exoneration. The goal was not to help Leo Frank, who was of course past caring, but to do damage control; to conceal from the public the fact that such crimes were being committed by prominent members of the Jewish community by claiming that all reports of such crimes are “Anti-Semitism.” That pattern continues to the present, with the wife of Bernie Madoff in 2011 still insisting that their fall from wealth is the “Gentile’s fault!”, and the case reported below in which Rebecca Zahau was found bound hand and foot, hanging in the home of another Jewish CEO, and promptly declared a suicide on the basis of a note written in a third party’s handwriting.

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is an anti-White, anti-American force whose primary goal is to destroy White-unity in the United States. Despite a few token legal cases that they point to all too often, their legal resources are primarily focused upon minority-empowerment over Americans.

The legal sword of Zionism, the SPLC has had many victories against White-unity organizations in America. But when Mark Watts and the Nationalist’s Forsyth County Defense League were sued by Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) in federal court in Atlanta in 1987 they had met their match.

The SPLC alleged that Nationalists had discriminated against "every Negro in the State of Georgia," used intimidation and violence and violated the Civil Rights Bill in Hosea Williams v. Forsyth County Defense League. The court sided with Nationalist attorney Richard Barrett who successfully defended the litigation and all charges against Nationalists were adjudicated as patently false. The Nationalists won again, stunning pro-communist forces throughout the United States and shaming the SPLC like no other organization had before or since.

Founded in 1971 by Jewish lawyer Joe Levin and Morris Seligman Dees (not Jewish but born into a philosemitic family who gave him his Jewish first name after Joseph Seligman; president Lincoln's Jewish banker), currently headed by Julian Bond (black, communist sympathizer. Bond's father's first experience with racism in 1916 was with a Jew.. )

Two of the center's most well known activists are Mark Potok and Heidi Beirich. (both Jewish) Alexander Zaitchik is a former SPLC operative who now continues doing the SPLC's work in another context.

The SPLC has a long-standing reputation for manipulating statistics and exaggerating the extent of “racism” or “hate” in America. The group earns millions a year by making false claims about 'hate groups' and the dangers they pose to America.

As of January 2010: Of the twenty-one members of the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff, twelve (12) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Of the eleven (11) members of the Southern Poverty Law Center board of directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses.

This is a numerical representation of 55%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* This means that Jews are over-represented on the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff by a factor of 28.5 times, or 2,850 [two thousand eight hundred and fifty percent] percent, and over-represented on the Southern Poverty Law Center board of directors by a factor of 27.5 times, or 2.750 %.

This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews on the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff and board of directors cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance.

You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the United States population could so dominate America's leading "civil rights" organization.

Annual income SPLC officials
Richard Cohen -- President/CEO -- $351.648
Morris Dees -- Chief Trial Counsel -- $346.919
Joseph Levin -- General Counsel -- $191.756
Jeff Blancett -- Former Oper. Officer -- $185.305
Rhonda Brownstein -- Legal Director -- $179.983
Teenie Hutchison -- Chief Financial Officer -- $155.144
Mark Potok -- Intelligence Director -- $143.206
Mary Bauer -- Immigrant Justice-- $141.111
Wendy Via -- Development Director -- $140.469
Thomas Brinkman -- Donor dollar Security and IT chief -- $142.639

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is an anti-White, anti-American force whose primary goal is to destroy White-unity in the United States. Despite a few token legal cases that they point to all too often, their legal resources are primarily focused upon minority-empowerment over Americans.

The legal sword of Zionism, the SPLC has had many victories against White-unity organizations in America. But when Mark Watts and the Nationalist’s Forsyth County Defense League were sued by Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) in federal court in Atlanta in 1987 they had met their match.

The SPLC alleged that Nationalists had discriminated against "every Negro in the State of Georgia," used intimidation and violence and violated the Civil Rights Bill in Hosea Williams v. Forsyth County Defense League. The court sided with Nationalist attorney Richard Barrett who successfully defended the litigation and all charges against Nationalists were adjudicated as patently false. The Nationalists won again, stunning pro-communist forces throughout the United States and shaming the SPLC like no other organization had before or since.

Founded in 1971 by Jewish lawyer Joe Levin and Morris Seligman Dees (not Jewish but born into a philosemitic family who gave him his Jewish first name after Joseph Seligman; president Lincoln's Jewish banker), currently headed by Julian Bond (black, communist sympathizer. Bond's father's first experience with racism in 1916 was with a Jew.. )

Two of the center's most well known activists are Mark Potok and Heidi Beirich. (both Jewish) Alexander Zaitchik is a former SPLC operative who now continues doing the SPLC's work in another context.

The SPLC has a long-standing reputation for manipulating statistics and exaggerating the extent of “racism” or “hate” in America. The group earns millions a year by making false claims about 'hate groups' and the dangers they pose to America.

As of January 2010: Of the twenty-one members of the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff, twelve (12) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Of the eleven (11) members of the Southern Poverty Law Center board of directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses.

This is a numerical representation of 55%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* This means that Jews are over-represented on the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff by a factor of 28.5 times, or 2,850 [two thousand eight hundred and fifty percent] percent, and over-represented on the Southern Poverty Law Center board of directors by a factor of 27.5 times, or 2.750 %.

This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews on the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff and board of directors cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance.

You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the United States population could so dominate America's leading "civil rights" organization.

Annual income SPLC officials
Richard Cohen -- President/CEO -- $351.648
Morris Dees -- Chief Trial Counsel -- $346.919
Joseph Levin -- General Counsel -- $191.756
Jeff Blancett -- Former Oper. Officer -- $185.305
Rhonda Brownstein -- Legal Director -- $179.983
Teenie Hutchison -- Chief Financial Officer -- $155.144
Mark Potok -- Intelligence Director -- $143.206
Mary Bauer -- Immigrant Justice-- $141.111
Wendy Via -- Development Director -- $140.469
Thomas Brinkman -- Donor dollar Security and IT chief -- $142.639

Refers to Zionist Occupied Government. Usually in reference to obvious incidents of government over-reach, especially toward Rightists.

One who stands strongly for white, Anglo-Saxons as the builders and sustainers of the nation and who committed themselves to preventing the overthrow of civilization as it had been embodied in the lineage, rights and blood of Englishmen. A term popularized at the turn of the Nineteenth Century. The most notable exponent was Ben "Pitchfork" Tillman.